Another Defender of The Broken DCF System Wants Her Fifteen Minutes of Fame


It never ceases to amaze me how people who have absolutly no clue what they are talking about are the first ones to scream at the top of their lungs. Those who are lost somewhere in their own reality and believe the mush they are served by those in charge of Chip Protective Services. Yes, I got more hate mail. The thing is – it is really sad when I am accused of not knowing what I am talking about when in reality it is the person who is spouting off at the mouth who knows nothing. They need to go back and get their facts straight before they play with the big boys. I have spent over twenty years of my life researching and dealing with DCF/CPS I know how they operate inside and out. I know what they are thinking before they even think it.

So with that being said, let me just post something actually three things from “momtotkn” who didn’t even have guts enough to sign her name to any of the three comments she so rashly wrote. Here is your fifteen minutes of fame. Enjoy.

Comment: number One

“Quite honeslty, I find your blog to be ridiculous and you appear to be very
uneducated with your grammar and story telling. I Don’t think you have a clue
how foster care works. You can get up to how much a month for these kids? IT’s
not the ‘norm’ at all to get 500 a month per child. In fact, the rate is 14.60
a dayfor younger kids, and most people spend more than this on clothing and
food for the children”

She needs to go back and read her Title IV- Funding manual. And or someone is lying to her big time. I have the manual for Georgia and yes she is from Lagrange Ga or the surrounding area. (Yes, I do my home work)  Now the lovely comment about the fact that I appear to be uneducated. If that were not so laughable it would surely piss me off. If she only knew how educated I am. Really that is the best shot she has. She needs to do her homework.

Second Comment:

“I am a foster parent and have never gotten reimbursed for christmas or birthday
gifts. I think the limit is 50$ per child for christmas and $25for birthdays. I
spend well over that on my foster children’s presents.”

Really- did you keep the receipts and turn them in along with the other receipts you are supposed to keep for reimbursement? Try again, As I said before I have the Title IV funding guide. I also have the breakdown  for Georgia. In fact it is on this blog in a post if you know how to find it go look.

Comment #3 Love this one

“I think you need to let go of this battle. It’s done. There
is more than blood family. Adoptive parents can be more ‘real’ to a child than
their biological family, when the biological family has done nothing to take
care of the child or protect the child. YOu might want to stop spewing your
venom, because one day these girls will find it and read it, and see what you
have written about their adoptive family, and they may want nothing to do with
you.”

First of all Lady and I use that term very loosely. There is nothing like blood no matter the circumstances. Every child wants to know it’s family and don’t fool yourself it will happen to you.  Second of all those children were never ever abused. Their mother was just poor. Third of all no they would not have sent them to Texas it would have meant losing federal dollars. And yes they will want something to do with their “blood family” when they are older. Trust and believe. You have no idea about this family or those in it.

Time for you to do your homework and live in the real world. If you were asked to take a child and not earn money the question is would you? The answer probably not!

 

About yvonnemason

Background:  The eldest of five children, Yvonne was born May 17, 1951 in Atlanta, Georgia. Raised in East Point, Georgia, she moved to Jackson County, Ga. until 2006 then moved to Port St. Lucie, Florida where she currently makes her home.  Licensed bounty hunter for the state of Georgia. Education:  After a 34 year absence, returned to college in 2004. Graduated with honors in Criminal Justice with an Associate’s degree from Lanier Technical College in 2006. Awards:  Nominated for the prestigious GOAL award in 2005 which encompasses all of the technical colleges. This award is based not only on excellence in academics but also leadership, positive attitude and the willingness to excel in one’s major. Affiliations:  Beta Sigma Phi Sorority  Member of The Florida Writer’s Association – Group Leader for St Lucie County The Dream:  Since learning to write at the age of five, Yvonne has wanted to be an author. She wrote her first novel Stan’s Story beginning in 1974 and completed it in 2006. Publication seemed impossible as rejections grew to 10 years. Determined, she continued adding to the story until her dream came true in 2006. The Inspiration:  Yvonne’s brother Stan has been her inspiration and hero in every facet of her life. He was stricken with Encephalitis at the tender age of nine months. He has defied every roadblock placed in his way and has been the driving force in every one of her accomplishments. He is the one who taught her never to give up The Author: Yvonne is currently the author of several novels, including:  Stan’s Story- the true story of her brother’s accomplishments, it has been compared to the style of Capote, and is currently being rewritten with new information for re-release.  Tangled Minds - a riveting story about a young girl’s bad decision and how it taints everyone’s life around her yet still manages to show that hope is always possible. This novel has been compared to the writing of Steinbeck and is currently being written as a screenplay. This novel will be re-released by Kerlak Publishing in 2009  Brilliant Insanity – released by Kerlak Publishing October 2008  Silent Scream – Released by Lulu.com October 2008- Slated to be made into a movie Yvonne’s Philosophy in Life - “Pay it Forward”: “In this life we all have been helped by others to attain our dreams and goals. We cannot pay it back but what we can do is ‘pay it forward’. It is a simple
This entry was posted in hate mail and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Another Defender of The Broken DCF System Wants Her Fifteen Minutes of Fame

  1. laura says:

    My fiance (31 yrs) was taken by cps bought by a very wealthy family, yes bought, the man sealed his records then apparently “disappeared”. When he ages 9yrs old he found out he was adopted, and dreamt of his real family, and at age 22 he found his biological mother and father. In his case yes, no matter the in betweens or things he was told, he still has the desire and want to meet his family that was absent for so long. I admit I am not high up there on education nor am I in for debate, but I do share his story in relation to posts.

    Like

  2. indio007 says:

    Keep up the good fight! This post is going to seem a little all over the place . This is because I could right 20 pages of legal reasons on way the state has no right to take anyone’s children whatsoever.
    Don’t listen to the naysayers. I have seen the system inside and out. You are right about everything. Children are sold for profit.
    The way to stop these people is with tort law. You need to get at these people personally. You can not rely on gov’t officials to protect your rights. They are all operating under color of law. Remember all men are created equal. A judge is just a man. A CPS worker is just a man. You can be scared of claims of authority.
    The doctrine of parens patrae is a ruse and a fraud perpetrated on the American people.
    The state is a body politic and as a body politic it can not be sovereign. Ex fide non ficta See Calvin’s Case. It has the complete case law on allegiance and is cited in 400 Federal Cases.

    ” A body politique (being invisible) can as a body politique neither make nor take homage: Vide 33 Hen. 8. tit. Fealty, Brook. 5. In fide, in faith or ligeance nothing ought to be feigned, but ought to be ex fide non ficta.”

    Sorry to break this to everyone but there is no state and there are no citizens.
    The government disavows any duty to protect any individual person.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotus.html
    That is a condition of sovereignty.

    “Ligeance is a true and faithful obedience of the subject due to his Sovereign. – This ligeance and obedience is an incident inseparable to every subject: for as soon as he is born he oweth by birth-right ligeance and obedience to his Sovereign. But between the Sovereign and the subject there is without comparison a higher and greater connexion: for as the subject oweth to the King his true and faithful ligeance and obedience, so the Sovereign is to govern and protect his subjects..

    …. ligeance is the mutual bond and obligation between the King and his subjects, whereby subjects are called his liege subjects, because they are bound to obey and serve him; and he is called their liege lord, because he should maintain and defend them.”

    This is the legal rational behind parens patrae.

    In regards to slavery, the exact same rules of law that determine whether someone is a slave or not are IDENTICAL in determining whether someone is a subject/citizen (the two words are legally synonymous)

    Secretary of State
    SUBMITTING REPORT ON THE SUBJECT OF CITIZENSHIP, EXPATRIATION, AND PROTECTION ABROAD. December 20, 1906

    In Ex parte Reynolds, supra, the question
    was discussed at some length, and the court, while stating that as
    between a freeman and a slave the principle of the Roman civil law,
    expressed in the maxim partus sequitur ventrem, was applied, and so
    the offspring be a slave, yet a clifferent rule was applied between
    freemen. He said :

    But by the common law this rule is reversed with regard to the offspring of
    free persons. Their offspring follows the condition of the father, and the rule
    partus sequitur patrem prevails in determining their status. This is the uni-
    versal maxim of the common law with regard to freemen — as old as the common
    law or even as the Roman civil law, and as well settled as the rule partus
    sequitur ventrem — the one being a rule fixing the status of freemen ; the other
    being a rule defining the ownership of property — the one applicable to different
    political comnmnities or states, whose citizens are in the enjoyment of the civil
    rights possessed by people in a state of freedom ; the other defining the condi-
    tion of the oft’spring which had been tainted by the bondage of the mother. No
    other rules than the ones above enumerated ever did prevail in this or any other
    civilized country. * * * These Indians are freemen.

    ***********************

    This is the universal maxim of the common law with regard to freemen,
    as old as the common law, or even as the Roman civil law, and as well settled
    as the rule partus sequitur ventrem. the one being a rule fixing the status of
    freemen, the other being a rule defining the ownership of property ; the one
    applicable to different political communities or states, whose citizens are in
    the enjoyment of the civil rights possessed by people in a state of freedom,
    the other defining the condition of the offspring which had been tainted by the
    bondage of the mother.

    No other rules than the ones above enumerated ever did prevail in this or
    any other civilized country. In the case of Ludlam v. Ludlam (31 Barb.. 486)
    the court says: “The universal maxim of the common law being partus
    sequitur patrem, it is suflicient for the application of this doctrine that the
    father should be a subject lawfully, and without breach of his allegiance
    beyond sea, no matter what may be the condition of the mother.”

    The law of nations, which becomes, when applicable to an existing condition of affairs in a country, a part of the common law of that country, declares the same rule. Vattel, in his Law of Nations (p. 101), says: “As the society can not exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, these children naturally follow the condition of their fathers and succeed to their rights. * * * The country of the father is, therefore, that of the children, and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.” Again, on page 102, Vattel says : ” By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers and enter into all their rights.” This law of nature, as far as it has become a part of the common law, in the absence of any postive enactment on the subject, must be the rule in this case.

    Whoever thinks that confessing citizenship isn’t confessing slavery is simply ill-informed.
    The courts declare what the law means. I have presented definitive proof of what the law is. It’s a sad state of affairs we are in. I was in foster care . I have been researching the legal rationale for over 5 years. The right to one’s children is the highest property right recognized by law since time out of mind. The only way they can own them is if they own you.

    You should also read Corpus Juris Parent and Child and American Jurisprudence Parent and Child.
    This is where they show their hand. A child custody proceeding is a proceeding IN REM. In rem means “the object” . The object that the court is adjudicating is the “status” of the parent. They determine whether the parent is fit or unfit. What gives them the right to do this? Subjugation
    . If you don’t contest it the courts will presume that the child is already the property of the state. They are not determining anything else. The are not determining who has a right to the child. They have already presumed it is the STATE if you do not object. They are only determining whether their slave is good enough.
    If your child is ever taken away you must immediately file a writ of Homine replegiando NOT HABEAS CORPUS AD SUBJECTUM and deny you are a subject of the state.

    Sorry about the length of the post but you will never prevail as a subject within their system. We know what they are doing. We know why they are doing it. It is common knowledge at this point. We need to strike the root to defeat them.

    One more cite from Calvin’s Case decided by Lord Coke

    ligeance is a quality of the mind, and not confined within any place.

    Good luck to you!

    Like

  3. Rob says:

    You have a very nice blog here, I was wondering if you would mind if I put a link to it on my website?

    Like

  4. daveahealthmoney77@gmail.com says:

    Dcf in Brockton mass stole my infant they are duty people. I don’t know how they sleep at night one thing all u Brockton dcf workers better remember

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s