Fort Bend parents’ lawsuit led to changes calling for court orders before state pulls alleged victims from homes in abuse cases


Fort Bend parents’ lawsuit led to changes calling for court orders before state pulls alleged victims from homes in abuse cases

By JANET ELLIOTT
Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle Austin Bureau
Aug. 27, 2008, 4:16AM

AUSTIN — Texas child abuse investigators are being advised to seek court orders before removing children from their home in all but the most dangerous situations, one of several major policy changes demanded by a federal appeals court.

The new standards, lauded by parental rights advocates and decried by prosecutors, arose out of a ruling late last month by a three-judge panel of the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in a long-running lawsuit against the state filed by a Fort Bend County couple and their 13 children.

The court found that state and local officials who removed the children during a child abuse investigation may have acted improperly but were protected by government immunity.

But the court set out new legal requirements for child abuse investigations in the three states covered by its jurisdiction — Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.

“The decision will require us to make some extremely difficult decisions,” said Carey Cockerell, commissioner of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services in an “urgent legal advisory” sent Friday to all Child Protective Services personnel.

The memo, obtained by the Houston Chronicle and San Antonio Express-News, said the new policies must be followed to protect staff from being sued for monetary damages if children are removed in violation of the new policies.

New standard

In the majority of cases, the department removes based on immediate danger and then goes to court the next business day to ask a judge for an order to remove the child.

Under the new standard, the state must obtain parental consent or a court order prior to removal “unless life or limb is in immediate jeopardy or sexual abuse is about to occur,” the memo states.

Additionally, investigators now must weigh factors for each child living in a home before removing any of them based on allegations of abuse involving another child. The standard practice of removing all children in a household when abuse was suspected on any single child was the basis for removing more than 400 children from a West Texas polygamist group in April.

The Texas Supreme Court in late May held that removing all the children was not justified based on allegations that a few underage girls were married to older men.

Another key change discussed in the memo involves when CPS can take a child from school to a neutral location such as a Children’s Advocacy Center for an interview. The new policy requires parental consent, a court order or the belief that the child has been abused and probably will suffer further abuse upon his or her return home at the end of the day.

Prosecutors and child advocates are worried that children will be left in dangerous situations, while parental rights groups are applauding the changes.

Williamson County District Attorney John Bradley said he believes the department’s new policies are an overreaction to the ruling and will leave children unprotected.

“What we didn’t need to do was raise the white flag in a memo to every CPS worker to simply protect CPS rather than protect children,” he said.

He said it will be more difficult to prosecute child abusers if child victims can’t be questioned separately from their abusers.

“You have to have a safe place apart from the family to successfully interview a child and find out what happened,” Bradley said.

Gary Gates, the Fort Bend County man whose lawsuit prompted the revisions, said the changes will protect families from having their constitutional rights violated.

“The whole reason we started the litigation was because we felt there were wrongs in the system,” said Gates, an apartment building owner and founder of the Texas Center for Family Rights.

Thomas Sanders, the Sugar Land attorney who represents the Gates family, said the lawsuit was never about winning monetary damages from the state.

“He was looking for policy change,” Sanders said.

Richard Wexler, executive director of the Virginia-based National Coalition for Child Protection Reform, said it’s not that difficult to get a court order for removal.

He said the new policies will give investigators “a chance to stop and think whether there is something that can be done that is less traumatic to the child” than removing them from their home.

The Gates family claimed state and local officials violated their rights when their children were removed from their home during a child abuse investigation.

The investigation began in 2000 after a 10-year-old son arrived at school with a plastic baggie containing empty fig bar wrappers pinned to his shirt. According to the court opinion, Gates was punishing the boy who had an eating disorder that caused him to steal and gorge on food.

When school officials called CPS, the boy was taken to a Child Advocacy Center for a videotaped interview. After other siblings told of unusual discipline, all were removed in a “jail wagon” that evening.

Gary and Melissa Gates said they never abused their children and a court ordered them returned home a few days later. The state dropped its investigation seven months later.

The federal appeals court said it is important to involve the state courts as neutral magistrates in decisions whether to remove children as early in the process as possible.

“In that way, the government may ensure that everyone’s interests are considered, and the least amount of harm will come to the children the government seeks to protect, as well as their parents,” said the opinion by Judge Edward Prado.

janet.elliott@chron.com

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/5967444.html

Emphasis added by H4K Editor

About yvonnemason

Background:  The eldest of five children, Yvonne was born May 17, 1951 in Atlanta, Georgia. Raised in East Point, Georgia, she moved to Jackson County, Ga. until 2006 then moved to Port St. Lucie, Florida where she currently makes her home.  Licensed bounty hunter for the state of Georgia. Education:  After a 34 year absence, returned to college in 2004. Graduated with honors in Criminal Justice with an Associate’s degree from Lanier Technical College in 2006. Awards:  Nominated for the prestigious GOAL award in 2005 which encompasses all of the technical colleges. This award is based not only on excellence in academics but also leadership, positive attitude and the willingness to excel in one’s major. Affiliations:  Beta Sigma Phi Sorority  Member of The Florida Writer’s Association – Group Leader for St Lucie County The Dream:  Since learning to write at the age of five, Yvonne has wanted to be an author. She wrote her first novel Stan’s Story beginning in 1974 and completed it in 2006. Publication seemed impossible as rejections grew to 10 years. Determined, she continued adding to the story until her dream came true in 2006. The Inspiration:  Yvonne’s brother Stan has been her inspiration and hero in every facet of her life. He was stricken with Encephalitis at the tender age of nine months. He has defied every roadblock placed in his way and has been the driving force in every one of her accomplishments. He is the one who taught her never to give up The Author: Yvonne is currently the author of several novels, including:  Stan’s Story- the true story of her brother’s accomplishments, it has been compared to the style of Capote, and is currently being rewritten with new information for re-release.  Tangled Minds - a riveting story about a young girl’s bad decision and how it taints everyone’s life around her yet still manages to show that hope is always possible. This novel has been compared to the writing of Steinbeck and is currently being written as a screenplay. This novel will be re-released by Kerlak Publishing in 2009  Brilliant Insanity – released by Kerlak Publishing October 2008  Silent Scream – Released by Lulu.com October 2008- Slated to be made into a movie Yvonne’s Philosophy in Life - “Pay it Forward”: “In this life we all have been helped by others to attain our dreams and goals. We cannot pay it back but what we can do is ‘pay it forward’. It is a simple
This entry was posted in Abuse by CPS, Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s